Schachcomputer.info Community
Prev Vorheriger Beitrag   Nächster Beitrag Next
  #30  
Alt 07.07.2024, 13:27
Tibono Tibono ist offline
Resurrection
 
Registriert seit: 22.05.2018
Ort: Frankreich
Alter: 63
Land:
Beiträge: 587
Abgegebene Danke: 3.477
Erhielt 1.392 Danke für 468 Beiträge
Aktivitäten Langlebigkeit
5/20 7/20
Heute Beiträge
0/3 ssssss587
AW: Elo game levels

Hi all,

about Maia and search width, I analyzed this position from round 7, Maia_1800 plays black vs Academy_1800, move 56:



Maia played 56. ... Ke4?? that immediately lost (mate in 1: 57.Rd4#).

First control: I set the position and level = 1 node, Maia_1800 plays the same: this move is indeed the "natural" one from the 1800 net knowledge.

I then increased the granted number of nodes and used multi-PV set to 4 and repeated the search (with an engine restart each time) until the Ke4 move is assigned the -M1 score, meaning Maia is fully aware of the potential blunder.

Worth reading: Lc0 options. The options that drive the search width appear to be CPuct, CPuctBase and CPuctFactor; with an additional set of options dedicated to the root of the search.

Using the default setting of lc0 (here I run the 026.3 version): CPuct & CPuctAtRoot=2.147; CPuctBase & CPuctBaseAtRoot=18368; CPuctFactor & CPuctFactorAtRoot=2.815) Maia still wants to play Ke4 up to 8 nodes searched (score -1.59).
Starting with 9 nodes searched, Maia prefers the correct move Kc4 thanks to the better score -1.52, but Ke4 is still granted -1.59. Reached depth is 3/5.

Maia needs 16 searched nodes in order to assign Ke4 the correct -M1 score; reached depth is 3/6. According to the NPSLimit I set for Maia_1800 (1.26), it requires a 12.7 seconds search (and according to the move number 56, the 30 minutes limit for all game, and the played blunder, Maia_1800 must have spent less time on that move).

Then I pushed the above UCI options to each limit in order to maximize the width of the search: CPuct & CPuctAtRoot=100; CPuctBase & CPuctBaseAtRoot=1; CPuctFactor & CPuctFactorAtRoot=1000. Maia still wants to play Ke4 up to 7 nodes searched (-1.81 score ).
Starting with 8 nodes searched, Maia prefers the correct move Kc4 thanks to the better score -1.55, but Ke4 is still granted -1.81. Reached depth is 2/4.

Now to the real gain: Maia needs only 11 searched nodes to assign Ke4 the -M1 score, depth 2/5 (reminder: default setting needed 16 nodes and depth 3/6). Associated displayed variant is Kd5e4 Rd2d4+. Maia is now aware. This result would have required 8.7 seconds search using my NPSLimit setting, a better chance than the above 12.7 using default values.

Worth additional tests over full games...
MfG,
Eric
Mit Zitat antworten
 

Themen-Optionen
Ansicht

Forumregeln
Du bist nicht berechtigt, neue Themen zu erstellen.
Du bist nicht berechtigt, auf Beiträge zu antworten.
Du bist nicht berechtigt, Anhänge hochzuladen.
Du bist nicht berechtigt, deine Beiträge zu bearbeiten.

BB code ist An
Smileys sind An.
[IMG] Code ist An.
HTML-Code ist An.

Gehe zu

Ähnliche Themen
Thema Erstellt von Forum Antworten Letzter Beitrag
Turnier: 10 game match between TheKing personalities Ray Partien und Turniere / Games and Tournaments 9 27.01.2022 14:52
Hilfe: Great Game Machine Sargon Die ganze Welt der Schachcomputer / World of chess computers 4 19.07.2012 06:46
Save Game Funktion Stefan Die ganze Welt der Schachcomputer / World of chess computers 1 27.05.2005 23:32


Alle Zeitangaben in WEZ +2. Es ist jetzt 02:22 Uhr.



Powered by vBulletin (Deutsch)
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Schachcomputer.info