4te Duell
CXG Sphinx 50+ vs Mephisto SuperMondial
Der Sumo spielte kräftig und klug ein taktischer Zug (10...d5 !!)
Danach konnte der Sphinx noch fast alle Angriffe widerlegen, doch am ende hatte er ein bauer weniger.
Auch später kam der Sumo heraus und wenn der Sphinx , die doch nähe jede Zug ein Halbzug weniger rechnete, auch noch 33.d7 und 37 Sd4 ?? spielte war alles klar.
[Event "iSchach Team Duel"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2015.11.21"]
[Round "1"]
[White "CXG Sphinx 50+"]
[Black "Supermondial B"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "1880"]
[BlackElo "1885"]
[PlyCount "82"]
[EventDate "2015.??.??"]
[TimeControl "48000"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 d6 (4... d5 5. Nxc6 bxc6 6. e5 (6. exd5
Qxd5 7. Qxd5 cxd5 8. Nc3 $14) 6... Qc7 $11) 5. c4 {The Maroczy Bind setup, one
of the ways explored by GMs to defeat the Sicilian Defense} Nxd4 (5... Nf6 6.
Nc3 g6 7. Be2 Bg7 8. Be3 $11) 6. Qxd4 Nf6 7. Bg5 e5 {
Opts for a Scheveningen setup} 8. Qd3 Qb6 9. b3 (9. Nc3 Qxb2 10. Rb1 Qa3 11.
Rb3 Qc5 12. Bxf6 gxf6 $14) 9... Ng4 10. Qd2 $6 (10. Be3 Nxe3 11. Qxe3 Qxe3+ 12.
fxe3 Be7 {Not really nice but it was required. Look what the Sumo does with a
non blundering move even !}) 10... d5 $3 {Threatens Bb4 Nc3 d4 !} 11. cxd5 Bb4
12. Nc3 Nxf2 $17 13. Be3 {The Sumo must have calculated this otherwise Nxf2
doesn't make sense at all, as he would loose a piece.} Nxe4 14. Bb5+ $2 (14.
Nxe4 $4 Qxe3+ 15. Kd1 Bg4+ 16. Be2 Bxd2 $19) (14. Bxb6 {Was the best move} Nxd2
15. Kxd2 axb6 16. Bc4 Bf5 $17) 14... Qxb5 $2 (14... Bd7 15. Bxd7+ Kxd7 16. Bxb6
Bxc3 17. Qxc3 Nxc3 18. Bf2 Rhc8 $19) 15. Nxb5 Nxd2 16. Bxd2 Bxd2+ 17. Kxd2 {
and black is a pawn up} O-O 18. Nc7 Rb8 19. Ke3 Bg4 20. Ke4 f6 21. Rhc1 Rbc8
22. Nb5 f5+ $5 {another surprising move of the Sumo} (22... Rce8 23. Nxa7 f5+
$15) 23. Kxe5 Rfe8+ 24. Kd6 Rcd8+ 25. Kc5 Re2 $15 26. h3 Bh5 27. Nxa7 Rxg2 28.
Nb5 Bf3 29. d6 Rd2 $11 30. Kb6 Ra8 31. a4 Ra6+ $2 (31... Kf7 32. Rc7+ Kf6 33.
Rg1 Bd5 34. Rgxg7 Bxb3 $14) 32. Kc7 Kf7 33. d7 $2 {
Gives the pawn actually Gives the pawn away} (33. Rf1 Rc6+ 34. Kb8 Be4 35.
Rad1 Rxd1 36. Rxd1 Ke8 37. d7+ Kd8 $14) 33... Ke7 $17 34. Re1+ Be4 35. Rad1
Rc6+ 36. Kb8 (36. Kxb7 $4 Rxd1 37. Rxd1 Rc1+) 36... Rxd7 37. Nd4 $4 {
Falls into a mate in 5 trap. Do you happen to see it ?} (37. Rxd7+ Kxd7 38. Rg1
g6 39. h4 $19) 37... Rd8+ {Now its a mate in 4} 38. Kxb7 (38. Ka7 Ra6#) 38...
Rd7+ {Mate in 3} 39. Kb8 Rb6+ {Mate in 2} 40. Kc8 Rd8+ {Mate in 1} 41. Kc7 Rb7#
0-1
Also steht es:
1. Fidelity Designer 2265 (2039) - Novag Citrine (2051)_________________________1 - 1
2. Mach III/Fid Designer 2265 (2039) - Meph/Saitek Chess Challenger (2021)_______0 - 2
3. Saitek D++ 8Mhz ( ~1975) - Mephisto Explorer (1974)_______________________ 0 - 2
4. Sphinx 50+ - Mephisto Supermondial (1883)________________________________0 - 1
26.11.2015, 17:03
Baum-Darstellung
Ähnliche Themen