Das zweite Test Spiel ist ein Spiel aus 1957. Diesmal tun sich eigentlich alle Brettcomputers schwer. Es gibt einige Stellungen wo der Schachcomputer gewaehlte Zug eigentlich von eine gewonnene Stellung zu eine verlorene Stellung umwandelt. Diesmal ist es David Kittinger mit Jade 2 was dieses Spiel am besten versteht. Der King 2.54 ist erstaunlich schlecht, er versteht hier fasst garnichts.
Test Spiel 2
A. MANGINI - A. KOTOV
Mar del Plata, Argentina 1957
Der Alexander Kotov spielte dieses Spiel mit einer analysierte Staerke von ELO 2629.
Critter 1.6a (unten nicht Angezeigt) schaffte es mit ELO 2828 und P75 - MChess Pro 5 (unten nicht Angezeigt) mit auch nur eine schwache Bewertung von ELO 1751.
Ausser Critter 1.6a, saemtliche bis jetzt getesteten Programme haetten in dieses Spiel ganz klar gegen den Alexander Kotov verloren!
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Bd3 Nc6 6. c3 {Start Test}
[Event "Leonard Barden Test Game 2"]
[Site "Mar del Plata, 1957"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Mangini, A."]
[Black "Kotov, A."]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B55"]
[Annotator ",Microsoft"]
[PlyCount "56"]
[EventDate "1957.??.??"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Bd3 Nc6 6. c3 {Start Test} e5 {
2.5 = 6. /\ e5; 3.0 = 6. /\ g6; 2.6 = 6. /\ e6; 1.7 = 6. /\ Bd7; 1.7 = 6. /\
Ne5; 1.7 = 6. /\ Qc7; 1.5 = 6. /\ h6; 1.5 = 6. /\ Rb8; 1.3 = 6. /\ a6; 1.2 = 6.
/\ Qd7; 1.2 = 6. /\ Bg4; 1.2 = 6. /\ Qb6; 1.1 = 6. /\ Qa5; 1.0 = 6. /\d5} 7.
Nc2 d5 {4.0 = 7. /\ d5; 1.7 = 7. /\ Bg4; 1.3 = 7. /\ Be7; 1.0 = 7. /\ Be6} 8.
exd5 Nxd5 {3.0 = 8. /\ Nxd5; 2.2 = 8. /\ Qxe5; 1.0 = 8. /\ e4} 9. O-O Be6 {
4.0 = 9. /\ Be6; 2.8 = 9. /\ Be7; 2.8 = 9. /\ Bc5; 1.9 = 9. /\ h5; 1.8 = 9. /\
Nf6; 1.5 = 9. /\ a6; 1.0 = 9. /\h6} 10. Qf3 Bd6 {1.9 = 10. /\ Bd6; 4. 0 0. /\
Qd7; 3.9 = 10. /\ Qf6; 3.1 = 10. /\ Nf6; 2.7 = 10. /\ a6; 2.5 = 10. /\ Qc8; 2.
5 = 10. /\ Rc7; 2.5 = 10. /\ Rc8; 2.5 = 10. /\ Bc5; 2.1 = 10. /\ Be7; 1.9 = 10.
/\ Nb6; 1.6 = 10. /\ Qh4; 1.4 = 10. /\ h5; 1.3 = 10. /\ g6; 1.0 = 10. /\ Qb6}
11. Ne3 Nxe3 {
4.0 = 11. /\ Nxe3; 1.7 = 11. /\ Nf4; 1.0 = 11. /\ e4; 1.0 11. /\ Qf6} 12. Bxe3
O-O {4.0 = 12. /\ 0-0; 4.0 = 12. /\ f5; 1.1 = 12. /\ Qc7; 1.0 = 12. / \ Qd7; 1.
0 = 12. /\ Qe7} 13. Nd2 f5 {4.0 = 13. /\ f5; 2.4 = 13. /\ Be7; 1. 4 = 13. /\
Qc8; 1.3 = 13. /\ Qh4; 1.0 = 13. /\ Ba3} 14. Bc4 Qe7 {4.0 = 14. /\ Qe7; 3.6 =
14. /\ Qd7; 3.1 = 14. /\ Qf6; 2.6 = 14. /\ Qe8; 2.0 = 14. /\ Bf7; 2.0 = 14. /\
Qc8; 1.0 = 14. /\ Bxc4} 15. Bxe6+ Qxe6 {1.0 = 15. /\ Qxe6} 16. b4 e4 {
4.0 = 16. /\ e4; 3.1 = 16. /\ Rac8; 3.0 = 16. /\ a5; 2.7 = 16. / \ Bc7; 2.0 =
16. /\ Be7; 1.9 = 16. /\ Rad8; 1.7 = 16. /\ Rfe8; 1.7 = 16. / \ Rfd8; 1.6 = 16.
/\ h6; 1.6 = 16. /\ Rfc8; 1.5 = 16. /\ Rae8; 1.4 = 16. / \ Rf6; 1.3 = 16. /\
a6; 1.1 = 16. /\ Kh8; 1.0 = 16. /\Rf7} 17. Qe2 Qe5 {1.0 = 17. /\ Qe5; 4.0 = 17.
/\ Be5; 3.3 = 17. /\ Kh8; 3.0 = 17. /\ Ne5; 2. 6 = 17. /\ Rfe8; 2.6 = 17. /\
Rae8; 2.5 = 17. /\ Rac8; 2.2 = 17. /\ Ne7; 1. 8 = 17. /\ Rfd8; 1.5 = 17. /\
Rf7; 1.5 = 17. /\ Bc7; 1.3 = 17. /\ Rfc8; 1. 3 = 17. /\b6} 18. Qc4+ Kh8 {
2.0 = 18. /\ Kh8; 1.0 = 18. /\ Rf7} 19. g3 Rac8 {4.0 = 19. /\ Rac8; 2.9 = 19. /
\ Qf6; 1.5 = 19. /\ Qe7; 1.5 = 19. /\ f4; 1. 0 = 19. /\ Qe8} 20. Rfd1 Qf6 {
4.0 = 20. /\ Qf6; 2.0 = 20. /\ Qe7; 1.5 = 20. /\ Bb8; 1.2 = 20. /\ b5; 1.0 =
20. /\ Be7} 21. Qb3 Be5 {4.0 = 21. /\ Be5; 3. 6 = 21. /\ b6; 1.6 = 21. /\ Bc7;
1.5 = 21. /\ Rcd8; 1.2 = 21. /\ Ne5; 1.0 = 21. /\ Rfe8; 1.0 = 21. /\ Bb8} 22.
Nc4 f4 {4.0 = 22. /\ f4; 1.7 = 22. /\ b6; 1.0 = 22. /\ b5} 23. Bc5 e3 {
1.7 = 23. /\ e3; 4.0 = 23. /\ Na5; 2.4 = 23. /\ Rfe8; 1.0 = 23. /\ Qf5} 24.
Bxf8 exf2+ {4.0 = 24. /\ exf2+; 3.8 = 24. /\ fxg3} 25. Kg2 Rxf8 {
3.0 = 25. /\ Rxf8; 1.3 = 25. /\ fxg3} 26. Rd3 fxg3 {
3.0 = 26. /\ fxg3; 2.5 = 26. /\ f3} 27. Nd2 gxh2 {2.0 = 27. /\ gxh2} 28. Nf1
Qg6+ {1.0 = 28. /\ Qg6+; 3.0 = 28. /\ h1Q+; 3.0 = 28. /\ h1B+; 2.0 = 28. / \
h1R+; 1.0 = 28. /\ Qg5+; 1.0 = 28. /\ Qh4} 0-1
Test Spiel 2 Ratings - Ergebnisse
Test Spiel 2 Platzierung
| PLATZ | SPIELER | PUNKTE | % WERT | NICK'S ELO |
| 1 | Critter 1.6a 64 Bit - AMD Phenom 2 Core 2.8GHZ | 75.4 | 94.25% | 2828 |
| 2 | Herr Alexander Kotov | 70.0 | 87.50% | 2629 |
| 3 | Novag Jade 2 | 57.6 | 72.00% | 2160 |
| 4 | Saitek Travel Champion 2100 | 53.0 | 66.25% | 1988 |
| 5 | Mephisto TM Vancouver 68030 36 MHz | 52.3 | 65.38% | 1961 |
| 6 | Radioshack 2250XL Selective | 49.5 | 61.88% | 1856 |
| 7 | MChess Pro 5 - P75 | 46.7 | 58.38% | 1751 |
| 8 | Tasc CM 512K – 15 MHZ – KING 2.54 | 45.7 | 57.13% | 1714 |
| 9 | Radioshack 2250XL Brute Force | 44.0 | 55.00% | 1650 |
| 10 | CXG 3000 | 41.8 | 52.25% | 1568 |
| 11 | Fidelity Sensory 9 | 38.9 | 48.63% | 1459 |
| 12 | Novag Constellation JR | 35.0 | 43.75% | 1313 |
| 13 | Saitek MK 12 Trainer LV 5 90S/Zug | 28.0 | 35.00% | 1050 |
| 14 | Saitek MK 12 Trainer LV 4 15S/Zug | 28.0 | 35.00% | 1050 |
Der Durchschnittwert nach 2 Testspiele sieht so aus:
Durchschnitt nach 2 Testspiele
| PLATZ | SPIELER | PUNKTE | % WERT | NICK'S ELO |
| 1 | Critter 1.6a 64 Bit - AMD Phenom 2 Core 2.8GHZ | 149.2 | 93.25% | 2798 |
| 2 | Grandmaster Norm | 134.7 | 84.19% | 2528 |
| 3 | Saitek Travel Champion 2100 | 115.7 | 72.31% | 2169 |
| 4 | Novag Jade 2 | 114.6 | 71.63% | 2149 |
| 5 | Mephisto TM Vancouver 68030 36 MHz | 113.3 | 70.81% | 2124 |
| 6 | Radioshack 2250XL Selective | 111.0 | 69.38% | 2081 |
| 7 | Radioshack 2250XL Brute Force | 109.4 | 68.38% | 2051 |
| 8 | Tasc CM 512K – 15 MHZ – KING 2.54 | 107.9 | 67.44% | 2023 |
| 9 | MChess Pro 5 - P75 | 105.6 | 66.00% | 1980 |
| 10 | CXG 3000 | 89.8 | 56.13% | 1684 |
| 11 | Fidelity Sensory 9 | 80.3 | 50.19% | 1506 |
| 12 | Novag Constellation JR | 74.2 | 46.38% | 1391 |
| 13 | Saitek MK 12 Trainer LV 5 90S/Zug | 70.5 | 44.06% | 1322 |
| 14 | Saitek MK 12 Trainer LV 4 15S/Zug | 64.3 | 40.19% | 1206 |
Viele Gruesse,
Nick