Einzelnen Beitrag anzeigen
  #7  
Alt 17.11.2023, 11:58
Benutzerbild von Ray
Ray Ray ist offline
Mephisto MM 4 Turbo Kit
 
Registriert seit: 07.12.2019
Ort: United Kingdom
Beiträge: 168
Abgegebene Danke: 58
Erhielt 317 Danke für 103 Beiträge
Aktivitäten Langlebigkeit
2/20 5/20
Heute Beiträge
0/3 ssssss168
Re: Millennium CGPro2024 v Older CGPro

Game 5/10
[Event "CGP2024 V CGP 40m/2h 20m/1h Classic Book"]
[Round "5"]
[White "CGP"]
[Black "CGP2024"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "A29"]

1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.g3 Bc5 5.Bg2 a6 6.O-O d6 7.d3 O-O 8.Bg5 h6 9.Bxf6 Qxf6 10.Ne4 Qg6 11.Nxc5 dxc5 12.Nd2 Rd8 13.Ne4 b6 14.Nc3 Ra7 15.Nd5 Kf8 16.Qd2 Nd4 17.e3 Nc6 18.f4 Bf5 19.e4 Bg4 20.Rf2 Qh5 21.Raf1 Kg8 22.fxe5 Be6 23.b4 Qxe5 24.bxc5 bxc5 25.Rb1 Qd4 26.Rb3 Ne5 27.Qb2 c6 28.Qxd4 cxd4 29.Nf4 Bg4 30.Bf1 a5 31.Rb6 a4 32.a3 Raa8 33.Rfb2 g5 34.Ng2 f5 35.exf5 Bxf5 36.Ne1 Rf8 37.R6b4 c5 38.Rb5 Rae8 39.Rb1 Nxc4 40.dxc4 Bxb1 41.Rxb1 Re3 42.Bd3 Rfe8 43.Kf2 Kg7 44.Kf1 g4 45.Rd1 Rb8 46.Kg1 Rb3 47.Bf1 Rbc3 48.Nd3 Rxc4 49.Nb2 Rc2 50.Nxa4 Re5 51.Nb6 h5 52.a4 Re3 53.a5 Ra3 54.a6 Rca2 55.Rb1 d3 56.a7 Rxa7 57.Bxd3 Rd2 58.Bf1 Rb7 59.Nc4 Rxb1 60.Nxd2 Rd1 61.Nc4 Ra1 62.Nd2 Rd1 63.Nc4 Kf6 64.Kf2 Ra1 65.Nd2 Ke5 66.Ke2 Rc1 67.Kd3 Rd1 1/2-1/2


As expected, the match so far is close with the CGP2024 nudging ahead with an extra point but we are only half way through the match so anything could happen.

In this game the English, Bremen opening was played and I spotted something that surprised me a little at first. The original CGP was out of book at move 7 while the CGP2024’s stayed in book until move 9 when it had to start thinking. I will have to test this opening with the CGP2024 playing as black to see if its also out of book at move 7. I had thought that they would both have been out of book at the same time, but maybe this is normal and the book moves are unbalanced for white and black. According to the e-mail from Millennium the opening books in both machines are the same so this must be the case.

As a side note:
In the more detailed PDF manual Millennium e-mailed me for the CGP2024 it does not give any information about the books so I have suggested to Millennium they add more information such as names and numbers of moves.

So to the game. I had SF analyse it to highlight blunders but there’s little to report to be honest. Both machines played at their best and the moves marked as bad by SF were beyond the scope of either machine to calculate. For example, in the following position the CGP had just moved 22…Be6

White’s reply was 23.b4 but a better line of play would have been 23.Rf5 Bxf5 24.Rxf5 attacking the Queen 24…Qg6 25.Nf4 Qh7 only option! 26.e6 fxe6 27.Nxe6 and now White is in a very good position. But for the CG machines, to see this line of play through to a definitive advantage would be beyond their horizon.

It’s better to just play through and see the moves and decide for ourselves how well or badly the game was played. Despite being a draw I think they did well and when the CGP2024 offered a draw I accepted on behalf of the CGP as they were both showing a fairly consistent eval of or around 0.00

Current Score 3 – 2 to the CGP2024

Geändert von Ray (19.11.2023 um 13:15 Uhr) Grund: Spelling correction
Mit Zitat antworten
Folgende 2 Benutzer sagen Danke zu Ray für den nützlichen Beitrag:
paulwise3 (20.11.2023), Tibono (17.11.2023)